New FAQ available - Dark Eldar 7th edition, v1.0

http://www.blacklibrary.com/faqs-and-errata.html

http://www.blacklibrary.com/Downloads/Product/PDF/Warhammer-40k/7th-faq/Dark_Eldar_v1.0_Oct14.pdf

The complete contents:

Black Library wrote:

ERRATA
Page 69 - Weapons of Torture
Change the introductory sentence to:
'A model may replace their Melee weapon with one of the following:'

Page 72 - Succubus, Options
Change the first option to:
'May replace close combat weapon or splinter pistol with an archite glaive.'

Funny but also weak

that was quick, ok time to read.

Missed Orbs of Despair from Haemunculi Covens.

They are surely not S1 for 35 points.

Well, this means that you can definitely take a Succubus with both an agonizer (replaces CCW) and an Archite Glaive (replaces pistol).

Wow. That is an indredibly short and weak FaQ.

One things a campaign of annoying emails is called for.
Supposedly, or so I have heard, FAQs onbly come about when there are questions that have been asked often enough by enough people.
So what say we assemble the proper questions, and bombard the FAQ team?

well they were probably losing sale on the succubus because of the illegal set up. They had to fix that quick or else there sales will heart. as for the stuff that needs to be looked at and fixed. they are in no rush, after all that doesn't hurt there sales that bad.

Well, if that is the case, then someone needs to convince them that they're going to lose sales if they don't give Hellglaives back their +1A and/or give Hellions plasma grenades.

ahh but everyone already bought hellions, they were big last edition, that's why all the models no one bought are big now. because they wanted to sell them.

something i noticed is that they did NOT fix splinter racks. does that mean they are okay with it?

Squidmaster wrote:

Wow. That is an indredibly short and weak FaQ.

One things a campaign of annoying emails is called for.
Supposedly, or so I have heard, FAQs onbly come about when there are questions that have been asked often enough by enough people.
So what say we assemble the proper questions, and bombard the FAQ team?

I will be setting something up this afternoon, in between work

EDIT - done, there is a now a thread in the Rules section for posting additional FAQ/Errata questions we would like to see addressed.

I am my, lhamaean-hq-who's-shooting-a-pistol-that's-twin linked-from-a-raider-at-the-other-side-of-the-battle-field, complete lack of surprise