| eternal warrior | |
|
+5Squidmaster commandersasha koshi482 Erebus doomseer11b 9 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
doomseer11b Sybarite
Posts : 304 Join date : 2012-10-09 Location : South Carolina
| Subject: eternal warrior Wed Dec 24 2014, 20:00 | |
| Does this grant us FNP rolls with double strength weapons? | |
|
| |
Erebus HTMLaemonculus
Posts : 376 Join date : 2013-02-13 Location : Your nightmares
| Subject: Re: eternal warrior Wed Dec 24 2014, 20:14 | |
| | |
|
| |
doomseer11b Sybarite
Posts : 304 Join date : 2012-10-09 Location : South Carolina
| Subject: Re: eternal warrior Fri Dec 26 2014, 16:02 | |
| | |
|
| |
koshi482 Kabalite Warrior
Posts : 175 Join date : 2013-05-20 Location : United States
| Subject: Re: eternal warrior Fri Dec 26 2014, 17:11 | |
| Yes it would as your immune to the ID rule an as such would be allowed to role fnp. Just as if you were hit with a force weapon. | |
|
| |
commandersasha Sybarite
Posts : 414 Join date : 2012-12-26 Location : Wimbledon, London
| Subject: Re: eternal warrior Fri Dec 26 2014, 17:18 | |
| BRB, p36: a double strength wound acquires the ID rule. p164: FNP may not be taken against wounds with the ID rule. p163: Eternal Warior reduces the wound loss of an ID wound, it does not negate, cancel or remove the Instant Death rule.
So, no, you can't take a FNP wound against an ID wound, whether it was a double strength, an ID weapon, or any other powers and effects. | |
|
| |
Squidmaster Klaivex
Posts : 2225 Join date : 2013-12-18 Location : Hampshire, England
| Subject: Re: eternal warrior Fri Dec 26 2014, 18:11 | |
| To phrase it otherwise:
Feel no Pain: "Feel No Pain may not be taken against Destroyer attacks or against unsaved Wounds that have the Instant Death special rule."
So the important part there is that the attack have the Instant Death special rule. So it doesn;t matter what else you have, because the only important thing to consider is whether or not the attack has the Instant Death special rule. Thusly, if a model with toughness 8 is wounded by a strength 4 guy with a weapon that has the Instant Death special rule (like say a Husk Blade), Toughness 8 man does not get Feel No Pain, because the attack has that rule. THe phrasing of Feewl no Pain is all on the properties of the attack, not the properties on the person being attacked. | |
|
| |
koshi482 Kabalite Warrior
Posts : 175 Join date : 2013-05-20 Location : United States
| Subject: Re: eternal warrior Fri Dec 26 2014, 18:15 | |
| Yes but the wound does not have the ID rule. the eternal warrior rule makes the wound a regular wound | |
|
| |
koshi482 Kabalite Warrior
Posts : 175 Join date : 2013-05-20 Location : United States
| Subject: Re: eternal warrior Fri Dec 26 2014, 18:16 | |
| | |
|
| |
Erebus HTMLaemonculus
Posts : 376 Join date : 2013-02-13 Location : Your nightmares
| Subject: Re: eternal warrior Fri Dec 26 2014, 18:21 | |
| Eternal Warrior states that any unsaved wound that inflicts ID only reduces the wound by 1, instead of killing the model outright. As commandersasha pointed out, it does not remove, cancel or negate the ID rule in any way. The attack still has the ID rule and thus FNP still cannot be taken against it. | |
|
| |
Squidmaster Klaivex
Posts : 2225 Join date : 2013-12-18 Location : Hampshire, England
| Subject: Re: eternal warrior Fri Dec 26 2014, 18:23 | |
| Eternal Warrior: "If a model with the special rule suffers an unsaved Wound from an attack that inflicts Instant Death, it only reduces its Wounds by 1, instead of automatically reducing its Wounds to 0."
Doesn't say anything there about negating Instant Death, or removing that special rule in any way. | |
|
| |
Klaivex Charondyr Wych
Posts : 918 Join date : 2014-09-08
| Subject: Re: eternal warrior Fri Dec 26 2014, 18:24 | |
| The wound still has the ID rule. Your model still just takes one wound. The special rule does not say "ignore ID" it just says: reduce to 1 wound. So ID against Asurman for example does still cause 3 wounds against him but he reduces these 3 wounds to 1 wound. Attack has still the ID rule and the ID effect, Eternal warrior just reduces the wound loss. | |
|
| |
koshi482 Kabalite Warrior
Posts : 175 Join date : 2013-05-20 Location : United States
| Subject: Re: eternal warrior Fri Dec 26 2014, 18:44 | |
| Well I know a lot of ppl who play it wrong then. Owell the more you know | |
|
| |
Timatron Sybarite
Posts : 443 Join date : 2013-03-12 Location : Brighton
| Subject: Re: eternal warrior Tue Dec 30 2014, 06:43 | |
| It used to completely ignore all the effects of instant death in 5th ed I believe, I only noticed the discrepency recently. | |
|
| |
MurDok Kabalite Warrior
Posts : 220 Join date : 2013-07-24
| Subject: Re: eternal warrior Tue Dec 30 2014, 08:55 | |
| Wow I didn't even notice that it reduced the model down to 1 wound. Silly me I thought that the ID was negated totally lol. | |
|
| |
The Red King Hekatrix
Posts : 1239 Join date : 2013-07-09
| Subject: Re: eternal warrior Tue Dec 30 2014, 09:15 | |
| Reduce wounds dealt to one wound. Not the model. Iirc | |
|
| |
doomseer11b Sybarite
Posts : 304 Join date : 2012-10-09 Location : South Carolina
| Subject: Re: eternal warrior Fri Jan 23 2015, 05:06 | |
| Wait... So if I'm hit with an instant death hit, whether it be ID or double strength. I only take one wound, correct? Or am I reduced to one wound total? That last post confused me. Still haven't bought a rule book yet.... Broke sorry. And thank you all for divulging. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: eternal warrior | |
| |
|
| |
| eternal warrior | |
|