| Idea: Grotesquerie with Aberration as Warlord? Personal Traits. | |
|
+4dumpeal CptMetal fisheyes Marrath 8 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
Marrath Wych
Posts : 694 Join date : 2014-01-01 Location : A very spiky Webway-Hulk
| Subject: Idea: Grotesquerie with Aberration as Warlord? Personal Traits. Fri Oct 07 2016, 23:31 | |
| I was thinking about making the Aberration of a Grotesquerie the Warlord. Via Personal traits he can get one of the following: Counter-attack Furious Charge Outflank +1 extra Victory Point for Characters killed in a challenge by Aberration Feel No Pain Fearless + It will not die Could be funny, in combination with Succubus and/or Haemonculus. Could also make it hard for the enemy to get Slay the Warlord. Not very fluffy though. A Grotesque Archon? And FNP would be redundant too. Your thoughts? | |
|
| |
fisheyes Klaivex
Posts : 2150 Join date : 2016-02-18
| Subject: Re: Idea: Grotesquerie with Aberration as Warlord? Personal Traits. Sat Oct 08 2016, 02:46 | |
| Fearless and IWND are also redundant... | |
|
| |
CptMetal Dracon
Posts : 3069 Join date : 2015-03-03 Location : Ruhr Metropolian Area
| Subject: Re: Idea: Grotesquerie with Aberration as Warlord? Personal Traits. Sat Oct 08 2016, 09:39 | |
| Why not justify it as a crazy Haemonculus that turned himself into some kind of monster? I think it's a nice idea but remember that you don't get to reroll the trait | |
|
| |
Marrath Wych
Posts : 694 Join date : 2014-01-01 Location : A very spiky Webway-Hulk
| Subject: Re: Idea: Grotesquerie with Aberration as Warlord? Personal Traits. Sat Oct 08 2016, 13:07 | |
| @Fisheyes: Turn one both are not redundant, unless you have a character with em. No joke my Grotesques almost ran off the board turn one once. And they don't get IWND before turn 5, 4 with Hammy iirc.
Edit: They don't get IWND before turn 4, 3 with Hammy. @CptMetal: Lame! Well i guess GW also thinks Grotesques shouldn't be Warlords. Edit: Maybe a Haemonculus fashioned a Grotesque, so magnificent, Commorrites pay slaves to watch it lead a raid? | |
|
| |
dumpeal Hekatrix
Posts : 1275 Join date : 2015-02-13 Location : Québec
| Subject: Re: Idea: Grotesquerie with Aberration as Warlord? Personal Traits. Tue Oct 11 2016, 14:43 | |
| Aberations : The only leaders Archons trust enough to give them troops without fearing a coup d'etat.
Good Guy Abe : receive an army, doesn't try to kill his master. | |
|
| |
ZeusMendizabal Slave
Posts : 9 Join date : 2013-12-17
| Subject: Re: Idea: Grotesquerie with Aberration as Warlord? Personal Traits. Thu Oct 13 2016, 07:18 | |
| Honestly I think your on to something, since a lot of times I find myself using a lhamean as my Hq (there not characters so no Warlord Trait) aside from having a haemonculous from the grotesquerie. Even so, the abberation is tougher in lots of ways. however, I would not roll on personal, the actual dark eldar traits are better in most ways imo. There none to shabby for an abberation and not redundant outside #1 which gives you fear and is not great to begin with and as a coven grotesque you have it anyways. I find them of better use than the personal in this case though. | |
|
| |
Rhameil Hellion
Posts : 45 Join date : 2015-07-01
| Subject: Re: Idea: Grotesquerie with Aberration as Warlord? Personal Traits. Thu Oct 13 2016, 12:35 | |
| Can an Abberation (or any character) from the Covens book choose whether to roll on their warlord traits or the regular DE ones or does it have to be the Covens ones? | |
|
| |
Jimsolo Dracon
Posts : 3212 Join date : 2013-10-31 Location : Illinois
| Subject: Re: Idea: Grotesquerie with Aberration as Warlord? Personal Traits. Fri Oct 14 2016, 04:46 | |
| Regular or Covens, but not DE. | |
|
| |
ZeusMendizabal Slave
Posts : 9 Join date : 2013-12-17
| Subject: Re: Idea: Grotesquerie with Aberration as Warlord? Personal Traits. Sat Oct 15 2016, 08:36 | |
| Only Haemonculous get access to the warlord coven traits. otherwise you have to roll on Dark Eldar or The main rulebook.
Page 48 of the coven book says: If your warlord is a haemonculous, You may choose to roll on the table to the right instead of those found in warghammer 40,000: The rules or Codex: Dark eldar. | |
|
| |
CptMetal Dracon
Posts : 3069 Join date : 2015-03-03 Location : Ruhr Metropolian Area
| Subject: Re: Idea: Grotesquerie with Aberration as Warlord? Personal Traits. Sat Oct 15 2016, 17:17 | |
| Even better. So you could actually have an Aberration with labyrinth Cunning! | |
|
| |
Jimsolo Dracon
Posts : 3212 Join date : 2013-10-31 Location : Illinois
| Subject: Re: Idea: Grotesquerie with Aberration as Warlord? Personal Traits. Sun Oct 16 2016, 00:36 | |
| Does the abby have permission to select from the codex? | |
|
| |
Marrath Wych
Posts : 694 Join date : 2014-01-01 Location : A very spiky Webway-Hulk
| Subject: Re: Idea: Grotesquerie with Aberration as Warlord? Personal Traits. Sun Oct 16 2016, 01:06 | |
| - Jimsolo wrote:
- Does the abby have permission to select from the codex?
I think there's nothing disallowing it in the Supplement. Also has anyone tried a grot bomb in 7th? How about 2 Grotesqueries at minimum (4 squads of 3 and 2 hammys) for 780 points? Or are double formations forbidden somewhere? | |
|
| |
amorrowlyday Hekatrix
Posts : 1318 Join date : 2015-03-15 Location : Massachusetts
| Subject: Re: Idea: Grotesquerie with Aberration as Warlord? Personal Traits. Sun Oct 16 2016, 08:02 | |
| I can't comment on the abberation question beyond pointing out that the main codex specifically says "a dark eldar warlord" with no modifiers as to whom can take from it's warlord traits.
Double formations are completely legal provided they do not require any unique characters or models.
Grot bombs have been tried repeatedly, They aren't bad by any means but there's generally too much actual ID in play to make them the be all end all of play.
2 Grotesqueries in many comp environments would cut your source codex's by a third which is why it isn't usually recommended. If you want 4 fearless squads and can do without the psuedo-drugs then just take a Covenite Coterie instead, in terms of FOC slots it's identical.
That said I think a FAR, FAR more interesting chestnut just showed itself to be discussed:
RAW a base codex Haemonculus appears to be able to roll on the supplement table even though it wasn't purchased there. | |
|
| |
Jimsolo Dracon
Posts : 3212 Join date : 2013-10-31 Location : Illinois
| Subject: Re: Idea: Grotesquerie with Aberration as Warlord? Personal Traits. Sun Oct 16 2016, 18:01 | |
| - Marrath wrote:
- Jimsolo wrote:
- Does the abby have permission to select from the codex?
I think there's nothing disallowing it in the Supplement.
Also has anyone tried a grot bomb in 7th? How about 2 Grotesqueries at minimum (4 squads of 3 and 2 hammys) for 780 points?
Or are double formations forbidden somewhere? I've run a grot bomb in the ITC events I've been attending. I experimented with it a bit before allying in a Corsair Void Dreamer with a Shimmershield. The addition of an Invulnerable save changes the game significantly; without it I wouldn't run the bomb in a serious setting. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Idea: Grotesquerie with Aberration as Warlord? Personal Traits. | |
| |
|
| |
| Idea: Grotesquerie with Aberration as Warlord? Personal Traits. | |
|