Sigh (non-Dukhari Previews)

Incubi Posts : 1921 Join date : 2018-04-02

This week on 'Models I really wish were for Dark Eldar':

Sigh (non-Dukhari Previews) HzajcUxl

Archon Posts : 4436 Join date : 2014-10-04 Location : Ohio

I'm still getting it, I don't need a 15th custom Archon, but i'm getting a 15th Custom Archon lol.

Or some Quin model.

Incubi Posts : 1921 Join date : 2018-04-02

amishprn86 wrote:: I'm still getting it, I don't need a 15th custom Archon, but i'm getting a 15th Custom Archon lol.

Or some Quin model.

Perhaps a Shadowseer?

Archon Posts : 4436 Join date : 2014-10-04 Location : Ohio

Soulless Samurai wrote:

amishprn86 wrote:: I'm still getting it, I don't need a 15th custom Archon, but i'm getting a 15th Custom Archon lol.

Or some Quin model.

Perhaps a Shadowseer?

Most likely a custom something with a relic

Subject: Re: Sigh (non-Dukhari Previews) Sun Apr 19 2020, 14:31

That's a bit too mystic to be a Dark Eldar HQ in my opinion. But I see it working for Harlequinn or Ynnari. Or as a Dark Eldar themed Craftworld army.

Archon Posts : 4436 Join date : 2014-10-04 Location : Ohio

The Strange Dark One wrote:: That's a bit too mystic to be a Dark Eldar HQ in my opinion. But I see it working for Harlequinn or Ynnari. Or as a Dark Eldar themed Craftworld army.

Not if you make that a flesh scarf!

Incubi Posts : 1505 Join date : 2017-09-12

Soulless Samurai wrote:: This week on 'Models I really wish were for Dark Eldar':

It seems really obvious to me that a lot of Age of Sigmar models are fully intended to be used as conversion or kitbash material for 40k. Zero reason why you couldn't run her as an Archon, Succubus or Shadowseer.

Incubi Posts : 1921 Join date : 2018-04-02

Burnage wrote:

Soulless Samurai wrote:: This week on 'Models I really wish were for Dark Eldar':

It seems really obvious to me that a lot of Age of Sigmar models are fully intended to be used as conversion or kitbash material for 40k. Zero reason why you couldn't run her as an Archon, Succubus or Shadowseer.

I could but that wasn't the point I was making.

My point was that I would like the option of HQs other than the mere 3 we've got now. But the only way to get rules for such is if GW can be ever be arsed releasing models for them. Hence my disappointment as seeing a model that would fit in almost perfectly with DE... but is instead for a completely unrelated faction.

Wych Posts : 521 Join date : 2012-12-30

what I wouldn't give for them to re-introduce Baron Sathonyx or Duke Slicious.

Those were my go to HQ's back in 5th edition. I think we would all rush out to buy them both if we had the option!

With good rules, the Baron could even make Hellions viable!

Incubi Posts : 1921 Join date : 2018-04-02

Silverglade wrote:: what I wouldn't give for them to re-introduce Baron Sathonyx or Duke Slicious.

Those were my go to HQ's back in 5th edition. I think we would all rush out to buy them both if we had the option!

With good rules, the Baron could even make Hellions viable!

Know what makes me sad?

One of the other things previewed was a new model for Illuminor Szeras.

But here's the thing - the "old" model for Szeras was still one of the newest models in the entire Necron range (IIRC it was made sometime around 7th edition).

It really bugs me that GW are spending their resources to remake a Necron character that was already almost brand-new, whilst we have 5 special characters that were all removed due to lack of models.

And I say this as someone who plays Necrons as well as DE.

Klaivex Posts : 2150 Join date : 2016-02-18

Darn, just bought two of the lame Resin Sslyth before the lock-down. These look WAY better.

Maybe a future Grotesque?

» Tau Previews
» Wave 3 previews
» Tau Previews Particularly Potent
» NOVA Previews
» Here is a compilation of the latest Drukhari Codex leaks/previews (Mar. 30)