| Classification of a 'Unit' | |
|
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
tlronin Wych
Posts : 818 Join date : 2011-06-23 Location : The Netherlands
| Subject: Re: Classification of a 'Unit' Wed Sep 19 2012, 20:41 | |
| I said the same as Mushkilla. *sigh*
But you've got your answer, so... There you go. You're welcome. | |
|
| |
Mushkilla Arena Champion
Posts : 4017 Join date : 2012-07-16 Location : Toroid Arena
| Subject: Re: Classification of a 'Unit' Thu Sep 20 2012, 07:33 | |
| Found it! Page 77 under Vehicle squadrons first paragraph - Quote :
Most vehicles fight as individual units and are represented by a single model.
| |
|
| |
tlronin Wych
Posts : 818 Join date : 2011-06-23 Location : The Netherlands
| Subject: Re: Classification of a 'Unit' Thu Sep 20 2012, 07:52 | |
| That's just 1 more hint.
Our main argument stands.
Good find though. | |
|
| |
Fruz Kabalite Warrior
Posts : 143 Join date : 2012-06-28
| Subject: Re: Classification of a 'Unit' Thu Sep 20 2012, 08:15 | |
| Haha, still on it Tlronin ? Whatever, your main argument has been irrelevant til now.
Thanks Mushkilla | |
|
| |
tlronin Wych
Posts : 818 Join date : 2011-06-23 Location : The Netherlands
| Subject: Re: Classification of a 'Unit' Thu Sep 20 2012, 09:03 | |
| I wás a bit angry that you wrote my main argument is 'irrelevant'. It's pretty hurtfull when someone tries to help you out. Then i thought, I don't know you. What do I care what you think really. Bit silly of me to just realize that now.
Funny how you thank Mushkilla, seeing as he chimed in on MY main argument which you found irrelevant and just did his best to explain it further to you. Seeing as you apparantly miss some basics about 40k somewhere down the line. Didn't wánt to insult you there, but can't help myself apparantly. If I'm honest, still a bit hurt about the 'irrelevant' bit. It's by the way the last time i'll answer questions from you. You don't appreciate it anyway and you don't read the answers really. Once you go at it, you have a filter which blocks good information is my experience in dealing with you.
Again, I'm very very happy for you that you found the magical answer to your irrelevant question.
*starts looking for the checkbox to not receive any notification e-mails from this thread*
| |
|
| |
Fruz Kabalite Warrior
Posts : 143 Join date : 2012-06-28
| Subject: Re: Classification of a 'Unit' Thu Sep 20 2012, 09:12 | |
| Man ... this is a W40k forum Oo
And if you really want to take is that seriously here just behave man. Behave and stop acting so childish or/and like an a**.
Thanks :/ | |
|
| |
tlronin Wych
Posts : 818 Join date : 2011-06-23 Location : The Netherlands
| Subject: Re: Classification of a 'Unit' Thu Sep 20 2012, 09:21 | |
| See, this is what i mean. I said the exact same thing about you. Only in a more grown up way (so without resorting to cursing) and by using more words. Maybe that's the problem. Should keep my posts shorter. As you can see, I haven't found the checkbox yet. Where is that thing? | |
|
| |
Fruz Kabalite Warrior
Posts : 143 Join date : 2012-06-28
| Subject: Re: Classification of a 'Unit' Thu Sep 20 2012, 09:25 | |
| You got a link "stop watching this topic" in the bottom of it.
And the difference is that it don't care much about what people think and about what happens here as it's just a forum, a virtual place to discuss about a game.
It seems to me that you don't read any of my messages and it must seem to you that I don't read yours ( which is not the case btw ). So just no point of continuing arguing here. | |
|
| |
tlronin Wych
Posts : 818 Join date : 2011-06-23 Location : The Netherlands
| Subject: Re: Classification of a 'Unit' Thu Sep 20 2012, 09:29 | |
| Well, we can agree on one thing then.
And, thank you. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Classification of a 'Unit' | |
| |
|
| |
| Classification of a 'Unit' | |
|