| Beastpack - changes | |
|
+13Scorpion Mushkilla Barrywise Bleaksoul Brethren sweetbacon Evil Space Elves Count Adhemar Thor665 amishprn86 mika Massaen Squidmaster LSK 17 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
LSK Kabalite Warrior
Posts : 227 Join date : 2013-05-24
| Subject: Beastpack - changes Sun Oct 05 2014, 13:47 | |
| I've looked at the beastpack and I found some changes that should be discussed.
Limited to 12 models: Bye bye 25+ models beaststar, which in my opinion is a good thing for the environment. Flocks are now Swarms and WS2... it makes them more fragile and less efficient. Khymera are now T4 and Daemons. It can be dangerous while facing GK or any Inquisition type list. Clawfiends can be taken without the BM tax. They have Rage. All Beastmasters can take specific melee weapons, not only one.
Some ideas:
X clawfiends + 1 Archon WWP / shadowfield 2++ Unit is majority T5, 3 HP per model, and can be DS anywhere.
X beastmasters all equiped with agonisers: Moving 12", Beast, shooting X2 poison (4+) shots, assaulting and wounding on 4+ AP3 when in combat. ---> i guess this will be FAQed one day or another.
Multiple units of X khymera, harrassing the opponent or used as a bait (cheap disposable units, with a real threatening value against the opponent).
IMO flocks must be associated with Khymera or Fiends due to their lack of toughness, but they will never be as good as before.
Your opinion? | |
|
| |
Squidmaster Klaivex
Posts : 2225 Join date : 2013-12-18 Location : Hampshire, England
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Sun Oct 05 2014, 14:56 | |
| I seem to be noticing something I'll add to this. There doesn;t appear to be any requirement to take Beastmasters at all. Sure it will result in a low Ld unit, but you COULD just take th Beatss without Beastmasters. Maybe stick a Fearless IC in there instead......
Edit: Hold on a mo.....are Beasts Bulky? Can I take say, a Haemonculus or Archon, put him in a unit of Beasts, and stick that lot in a Raider?!
Edit 2: I';ve checked....they're not! 1 Archon or Haemonculus, plus maybe 9 Clawed Fiends? In a Raider....?! | |
|
| |
Massaen Klaivex
Posts : 2268 Join date : 2011-07-05 Location : Western Australia
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Sun Oct 05 2014, 15:05 | |
| except beasts cant embark transports... | |
|
| |
mika Hellion
Posts : 36 Join date : 2014-10-05
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Sun Oct 05 2014, 15:06 | |
| The are not, but they are Type : Beasts, and only infantry can raid in a vehicle.
As for the all Beast Master unit it will cost to much (35pts. per model) and they got only 1 attack (no pistol).
I like fiends will a little group of khymera in front so they have a bit of save at the begining. | |
|
| |
amishprn86 Archon
Posts : 4436 Join date : 2014-10-04 Location : Ohio
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Sun Oct 05 2014, 15:33 | |
| Well I have 20 Khymerae's dont know if I want use them anymore, I will try to use them in 2 9's with 1 beast master and have some fast moving treat units for cheap. | |
|
| |
Thor665 Archon
Posts : 5546 Join date : 2011-06-10 Location : Venice, FL
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Sun Oct 05 2014, 16:46 | |
| I would say the biggest shift is that Beastmasters are no longer characters - that changes a lot of things.
Probably less birds and more Clawed Fiends is the new plot in my opinion. Also less Beastmasters. | |
|
| |
Count Adhemar Dark Lord of Granbretan
Posts : 7610 Join date : 2012-04-26 Location : London
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Sun Oct 05 2014, 23:59 | |
| Not really seeing any use for Beasts now, sadly. Fiends are still crap, Flocks are now crap, Khymerae are too fragile to actually get into combat with enough numbers to make a difference.
Maybe, just maybe, you could make a case for a unit of Khymerae as a distraction and to tie an enemy unit in combat for one turn, hopefully allowing another of our so-called assault units to attack without suffering the I penalty for charging into terrain (as apparently, only the Imperium ever thought of giving grenades to anyone who might need them). Chances are though that the dogs will be shot to hell, fail a morale check and be long gone before they even see the enemy.
As you may have gathered, I'm not too enamored with the new Beasts. | |
|
| |
Evil Space Elves Haemonculus Ancient
Posts : 3717 Join date : 2011-07-13 Location : Santa Cruz, ca
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Mon Oct 06 2014, 00:08 | |
| | |
|
| |
sweetbacon Wych
Posts : 609 Join date : 2014-02-09
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Mon Oct 06 2014, 00:11 | |
| Totally agree with the Count's assessment of the new Beasts. There is no reason to take them now. If you want T5 S5 close combat, Grots and Sslyths are both better and both do more damage. Razorwings are horrible now. If you want Rending, Reavers are now far superior. Khymera were so great before because of their 4++ and large numbers, which are both gone. It won't take long for an opponent to wipe out 12 (max!) 5++ T4 models. They only way Beasts are competitive now is in the three way competition between them, Hellions, and Wyches for worst unit in the new codex. | |
|
| |
Thor665 Archon
Posts : 5546 Join date : 2011-06-10 Location : Venice, FL
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Mon Oct 06 2014, 00:28 | |
| Wyches, Hellions, and Mandrakes are all easily worse than Beasts. I'd dare say Voidravens are also.
Bloodbrides are probably the worst thing in the codex right now though, if I had to cast my vote. So yay for the Mandrakes! | |
|
| |
sweetbacon Wych
Posts : 609 Join date : 2014-02-09
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Mon Oct 06 2014, 00:38 | |
| Good points, Thor. I totally forgot about Bloodbrides. And yeah, Mandrakes are still pretty bad as well. Haven't tried to new Voidraven but i assume it's on your list because of its point cost? | |
|
| |
Bleaksoul Brethren Sybarite
Posts : 252 Join date : 2014-09-02 Location : San Antonio
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Mon Oct 06 2014, 03:26 | |
| 1 man Khymerae holding objectives... enough said | |
|
| |
Barrywise Wych
Posts : 621 Join date : 2012-11-14 Location : Illinois
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Mon Oct 06 2014, 04:28 | |
| - Thor665 wrote:
- I would say the biggest shift is that Beastmasters are no longer characters - that changes a lot of things.
Can you imagine if they were? Chaos would have a field day! | |
|
| |
Thor665 Archon
Posts : 5546 Join date : 2011-06-10 Location : Venice, FL
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Mon Oct 06 2014, 05:11 | |
| I have had a Chaos player do exactly that to me, it really wasn't that bad, a lot of the time you wiped the enemy squad before it's even an issue. | |
|
| |
Mushkilla Arena Champion
Posts : 4017 Join date : 2012-07-16 Location : Toroid Arena
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Mon Oct 06 2014, 08:42 | |
| I still see a place for small beast squads, especially with the new clawed fiends. Beasts are fast and effective. Personally I would run:
2 beastmasters, 2 clawfiends - 80pts
The two beastmasters give you the leadership and majority weapon skill 4, its cheap an cheerful chaff unit that is mobile, ignorable and not bad in assault. Hell I would even consider running solo fiends, that way their terrible moral becomes irrelevant most of the time (or 1 fiend + 1 beastmaster). | |
|
| |
Scorpion Master of Mandrakes
Posts : 254 Join date : 2012-07-31
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Mon Oct 06 2014, 11:20 | |
| One use for a small beast pack could be support assault. Let the pack assault first and take overwatch and then assault with the other unit. If a beast actually makes it then you wont either need for the second unit to have grenades (if enemy unit is in terrain). | |
|
| |
Count Adhemar Dark Lord of Granbretan
Posts : 7610 Join date : 2012-04-26 Location : London
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Mon Oct 06 2014, 11:42 | |
| - Scorpion wrote:
- One use for a small beast pack could be support assault. Let the pack assault first and take overwatch and then assault with the other unit. If a beast actually makes it then you wont either need for the second unit to have grenades (if enemy unit is in terrain).
Fairly sure I suggested that in my post As for Mush's Clawed Fiends, I'm really not feeling them at all! A 30 point model with (basically) no armour, no ranged attack and that doesn't even kill a single Marine on the charge? I'll pass thanks. | |
|
| |
PainReaver Sybarite
Posts : 374 Join date : 2012-10-21
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Mon Oct 06 2014, 12:29 | |
| How about a small pack of Beastmasters w/ Agonizers? Like 4 or 5 (140/175). For about the price of a Grot unit sans Raider, you have a unit that can go monster hunting. | |
|
| |
Count Adhemar Dark Lord of Granbretan
Posts : 7610 Join date : 2012-04-26 Location : London
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Mon Oct 06 2014, 12:45 | |
| - PainReaver wrote:
- How about a small pack of Beastmasters w/ Agonizers? Like 4 or 5 (140/175). For about the price of a Grot unit sans Raider, you have a unit that can go monster hunting.
Very, very fragile unit. | |
|
| |
Vasara Incognito assault marine
Posts : 1160 Join date : 2012-08-22 Location : Vantaa
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Mon Oct 06 2014, 12:46 | |
| still 35pts for T3 model with 5+ and W1 is too much.
And landborn MCs are no problem to DE anyhow. Perhaps with 2+ they are but then the ago is no help ether. | |
|
| |
Deamon Sybarite
Posts : 265 Join date : 2012-05-09 Location : Drummondville
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Mon Oct 06 2014, 12:46 | |
| - PainReaver wrote:
- How about a small pack of Beastmasters w/ Agonizers? Like 4 or 5 (140/175). For about the price of a Grot unit sans Raider, you have a unit that can go monster hunting.
I guess it depends on what else you have on the table. But if I was, let's say an Eldar player with WK ou a Tyranids player, you can be sure that unit would be my priority and T3 5+ won't last more than a single shooting phase. | |
|
| |
PainReaver Sybarite
Posts : 374 Join date : 2012-10-21
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Mon Oct 06 2014, 12:47 | |
| - Count Adhemar wrote:
- PainReaver wrote:
- How about a small pack of Beastmasters w/ Agonizers? Like 4 or 5 (140/175). For about the price of a Grot unit sans Raider, you have a unit that can go monster hunting.
Very, very fragile unit. I know, it's super fragile. Basically use them like Hellions. Jump from cover to cover kind of deal. | |
|
| |
El_Jairo Kabalite Warrior
Posts : 215 Join date : 2012-02-07 Location : Leuven
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes Mon Oct 06 2014, 12:48 | |
| I can second the critical analyses of beasts. Restricted to 12, bad thing. No numbers required, good thing. Loss of special rules, bad thing. Maybe Razorwing Flocks might still be useful if you invest in Ld debuff. Together with fear now on Kymerae you might be hitting on 3+. But as you see I'm stretching already to get the unit useful. FnP would have been great in this unit as it stacks to any other save. Your beastmasters can get it but then you might as well field Hellions... | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Beastpack - changes | |
| |
|
| |
| Beastpack - changes | |
|