| Exact wording for Drukhari transports | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
The Red King Hekatrix
Posts : 1239 Join date : 2013-07-09
| Subject: Exact wording for Drukhari transports Wed Apr 04 2018, 19:22 | |
| So I don't know if it's been pointed out yet or if I was the only one concerned but the "Forge the narrative" YouTube podcast read the transport rules for the venom verbatim and it was "...may transport up to 5 drukhari infantry models not including scourge, grotesque, and skyboards."
So that's a relief for me. | |
|
| |
Lord Asvaldir Hekatrix
Posts : 1157 Join date : 2015-12-06
| Subject: Re: Exact wording for Drukhari transports Wed Apr 04 2018, 21:18 | |
| Yeah this has come up from multiple sources, the cries of fear about a keyword black heart raider being able to transport only other keyword black heart models is gone, we can put those fears to rest. | |
|
| |
mynamelegend Kabalite Warrior
Posts : 225 Join date : 2015-04-05
| Subject: Re: Exact wording for Drukhari transports Wed Apr 04 2018, 21:38 | |
| Wait, you can't put Grotesques in transports anymore? Boy that's a bit of a step down, 4 grots in a raider was just about the only way to field our HQs except for cramming all the HQs into a single venom. | |
|
| |
Lord Asvaldir Hekatrix
Posts : 1157 Join date : 2015-12-06
| Subject: Re: Exact wording for Drukhari transports Wed Apr 04 2018, 21:46 | |
| Incubi still serve just fine as a character escort since they don't need to be any specific unit size to fit in special/heavy weapons. | |
|
| |
mynamelegend Kabalite Warrior
Posts : 225 Join date : 2015-04-05
| Subject: Re: Exact wording for Drukhari transports Wed Apr 04 2018, 22:08 | |
| Incubi and Grotesques fit very different defensive profiles, though. Two models with T3 3+ and one with 4W T6 4++ aren't exactly slot-in replacements for one another. How are you even supposed to field Grots if not in a raider? Walk them up the table like a mon'keigh? | |
|
| |
Lord Asvaldir Hekatrix
Posts : 1157 Join date : 2015-12-06
| Subject: Re: Exact wording for Drukhari transports Thu Apr 05 2018, 00:06 | |
| I wasn't suggesting they fit even remotely the same sort or profile, merely that if you want an escort for your characters in a raider to be made up of a unit that can be made say 8 strong with no negative penalties to the number of special weapons they can take, incubi will do just fine.
M7 plus rerolling advancing isn't bad movement, especially for such a tough unit. I know we all love our transports but footslogging is a potential option sometimes, plan on trying it out for wracks escorted by a haemonculus. | |
|
| |
withershadow Wych
Posts : 597 Join date : 2018-04-02
| Subject: Re: Exact wording for Drukhari transports Thu Apr 05 2018, 00:49 | |
| - mynamelegend wrote:
- Wait, you can't put Grotesques in transports anymore? Boy that's a bit of a step down, 4 grots in a raider was just about the only way to field our HQs except for cramming all the HQs into a single venom.
The original quote is talking about Venoms, which could never transport grotesques. I would not assume this has changed from the Index. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Exact wording for Drukhari transports | |
| |
|
| |
| Exact wording for Drukhari transports | |
|