doomseer11b
Sybarite
Posts : 304
Join date : 2012-10-09
Location : South Carolina
 |  Subject: Shatterfield missiles  Thu May 02 2013, 05:31 | |
| so, is it legal to say that we can reroll armor penetration rolls for this? it says the second blast will get you in the fluff. However, in the rules it says reroll wounds. | |
|
Azdrubael
Incubi
Posts : 1857
Join date : 2011-11-16
Location : Russia
| | Subject: Re: Shatterfield missiles Thu May 02 2013, 06:45 | |
| Well, we play by the rules, so...
It is Strenght 7 thou, sometimes enough to strip hull points from lightly armored targets. | |
|
DominicJ
Wych
Posts : 662
Join date : 2013-01-23
| | Subject: Re: Shatterfield missiles Thu May 02 2013, 07:06 | |
| Its probably an oversight, but its pretty clear what it says | |
|
doomseer11b
Sybarite
Posts : 304
Join date : 2012-10-09
Location : South Carolina
| | Subject: Re: Shatterfield missiles Thu May 02 2013, 19:31 | |
| - Azdrubael wrote:
- Well, we play by the rules, so...
It is Strenght 7 thou, sometimes enough to strip hull points from lightly armored targets. I understand that we play by rules, wasn't sure if there was something I missed on the FAQ. Sarcasm noted and appreciated  | |
|
Dra'al Nacht
Kabalite Warrior
Posts : 103
Join date : 2012-12-09
Location : Perth, Australia
| | Subject: Re: Shatterfield missiles Fri May 03 2013, 03:49 | |
| From a fluff perspective, a vehicle would probably be far less susceptible to the freezing aspect of a Shatterfield Missile. | |
|
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Shatterfield missiles | |
| |
|
