So ill be running a series of games this next week or two with the primary goals being first to have fun and second to test. Below are a couple lists I will be running, each named after their primary differences:
SHIELDS & WARRIORS
HQ
archon, shadow field, huskblade, vb, drugs, hwg 145
ELITES
4 grotesques, aberration- vb, raider- sails, night shields 230
TROOPS
5 warriors, blaster, venom- 2 sc, night shields 135
5 warriors, blaster, venom- 2 sc, night shields 135
5 warriors, blaster, venom- 2 sc, night shields 135
5 warriors, venom- 2 sc, night shields, trophies 125
FA
9 beast pack, 3 bm, 6 rw 126
9 beast pack, 3 bm, 6 rw 126
HS
ravager, night shields 115
ravager, night shields 115
ravager, night shields 115
TOTAL 1497
WYCHES & INCUBI
HQ
archon, shadow field, huskblade, vb, drugs 140
ELITES
4 grotesques, liquifier, aberration- vb, raider- sails 230
TROOPS
5 wyches, hwg, venom- 2 sc, trophies 130
5 wyches, hwg, venom- 2 sc 125
5 wyches, hwg, venom- 2 sc 125
5 wyches, hwg, venom- 2 sc 125
5 warriors, raider 105
FA
18 beast pack, 4 bm, 8 khymera, 4 razorwing 204
HS
ravager 105
ravager 105
ravager 105
TOTAL 1499
Each army will face some mixture of xenos armies including tau orks necrons and then possibly nids possibly blood angels maybe even space wolves probably not gk but who knows.
I would like your predictions on which list will perform better overall and why. Then if my brain isnt fried I may even attempt some batreps.
The basic strategy of the disruption elements will be the same (bare raider is a backup for the grots) but the rest of the lists should, in theory, operate fundamentally different. Basically defensive and shooty vs a more mass rush approach.