| Adding A weapon with ignores cover would be awesome for the lack of artillery DE have | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Eldritchwarmaster84 Kabalite Warrior
Posts : 111 Join date : 2013-07-19
| Subject: Adding A weapon with ignores cover would be awesome for the lack of artillery DE have Sat Jul 20 2013, 01:40 | |
| I have been expirimenting lots of combinations with venoms, raiders, ravagers, etc and find very difficult to apporoach a tau list, involving stupid kroot spam for tar piting in a 2+ cover zone, i used bladevaneand caltrop combos, splinter spam, lance, spam nothing worked, but ignores cover, different story, even though it should be reasonally priced i hope they get something of that sort just a suggestion, | |
|
| |
Archon_Demetrious Kabalite Warrior
Posts : 114 Join date : 2013-04-28
| Subject: Re: Adding A weapon with ignores cover would be awesome for the lack of artillery DE have Sat Jul 20 2013, 03:17 | |
| Maybe if they change the rules for shedders... Make them ignore cover with ap5 now that would make those weapons more usable even if they are still blasts and mayb change their range to 24in | |
|
| |
Mushkilla Arena Champion
Posts : 4017 Join date : 2012-07-16 Location : Toroid Arena
| Subject: Re: Adding A weapon with ignores cover would be awesome for the lack of artillery DE have Sat Jul 20 2013, 08:14 | |
| The Aegis defence line won't give anything a cover save against bladevanes. _________________ Latest Report: BR4: The Repugnant Ramblers Vs Imperial Knights - 1250pts Pragmatic Realspace Raider Series
“Even the Black Buzzards thought highly of him, and those maniacs were renowned for hating everyone.” - Tantalus, by Braden Campbell
| |
|
| |
DominicJ Wych
Posts : 662 Join date : 2013-01-23
| Subject: Re: Adding A weapon with ignores cover would be awesome for the lack of artillery DE have Sat Jul 20 2013, 11:40 | |
| Liquifiers and close combat deny cover _________________ The Cult of the bloody disaster http://www.thedarkcity.net/t7466-cult-of-the-bloody-disaster
| |
|
| |
Shadows Revenge Hierarch of Tactica
Posts : 2587 Join date : 2011-08-10 Location : Bmore
| Subject: Re: Adding A weapon with ignores cover would be awesome for the lack of artillery DE have Mon Jul 22 2013, 15:48 | |
| its called a liquifer, it ignores cover _________________ Status: Usurping Kabal leadership for his Patriarch
Current List: First 2k GSC List
| |
|
| |
Eldritchwarmaster84 Kabalite Warrior
Posts : 111 Join date : 2013-07-19
| Subject: Re: Adding A weapon with ignores cover would be awesome for the lack of artillery DE have Mon Jul 22 2013, 18:59 | |
| I mean long range ignores cover weapons, The tau wont simply put their forces in the front, thell shoot you till your dead and use coward tactics and hiding behind cover:( Ignores cover would force them out of cover | |
|
| |
DominicJ Wych
Posts : 662 Join date : 2013-01-23
| Subject: Re: Adding A weapon with ignores cover would be awesome for the lack of artillery DE have Mon Jul 22 2013, 20:07 | |
| 12" deploy, 12" move, 18" flat out. They hide? Well go into their hiding places and tear their blue little faces off! _________________ The Cult of the bloody disaster http://www.thedarkcity.net/t7466-cult-of-the-bloody-disaster
| |
|
| |
Mushkilla Arena Champion
Posts : 4017 Join date : 2012-07-16 Location : Toroid Arena
| Subject: Re: Adding A weapon with ignores cover would be awesome for the lack of artillery DE have Tue Jul 23 2013, 07:16 | |
| This is a wish-listing rules suggestion topic and therefore I am moving it to the Rules Development section where it belongs. Please make sure you are posting in the correct section in future. _________________ Latest Report: BR4: The Repugnant Ramblers Vs Imperial Knights - 1250pts Pragmatic Realspace Raider Series
“Even the Black Buzzards thought highly of him, and those maniacs were renowned for hating everyone.” - Tantalus, by Braden Campbell
| |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Adding A weapon with ignores cover would be awesome for the lack of artillery DE have | |
| |
|
| |
| Adding A weapon with ignores cover would be awesome for the lack of artillery DE have | |
|