| The end of the SC on infantry. | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Selvhan Hellion
Posts : 81 Join date : 2013-03-09
| Subject: The end of the SC on infantry. Sun Oct 12 2014, 05:06 | |
| Before the new codex, I was using many squad of trueborn with SC. Ravager with DL. Now I changed all my SC for Blasterborn. I will keep 1 or 2 Ravager but I am now fielding Talos/Chronos.
I think the new codex killed the splinter Cannon on Infantry. The fact that it is now salvo mean that you are loosing a lot of range.
Also I was happy that scourge can now have 4 heavy weapon. But they are so fragile that I am not too sure about it anymore.
I played against the IG recently and SC are very useless when there is mostly/only tank on the table. I wish I could put a DC on venom.
| |
|
| |
1++ Hekatrix
Posts : 1036 Join date : 2011-06-27 Location : Sydney
| Subject: Re: The end of the SC on infantry. Sun Oct 12 2014, 06:31 | |
| Splinter Cannons on Talos is so good right now it's kind of redic. A unit of 3 pump out 18 TL shots that will more than likely reroll to wound but also wound on better than the 4+ due to the high strength of the Talos is a massive win. We haven't lost our firepower, it's just now on a different platform | |
|
| |
Bibitybopitybacon Wych
Posts : 592 Join date : 2012-07-01
| Subject: Re: The end of the SC on infantry. Sun Oct 12 2014, 06:37 | |
| - 1++ wrote:
- Splinter Cannons on Talos is so good right now it's kind of redic. A unit of 3 pump out 18 TL shots that will more than likely reroll to wound but also wound on better than the 4+ due to the high strength of the Talos is a massive win. We haven't lost our firepower, it's just now on a different platform
..not sure the splinter cannon is effected by the taloses strength... so no rerolls | |
|
| |
1++ Hekatrix
Posts : 1036 Join date : 2011-06-27 Location : Sydney
| Subject: Re: The end of the SC on infantry. Sun Oct 12 2014, 06:42 | |
| The strength does effect the to wound result, but on reading over the rule, I think I'm wrong with the reroll to wound from shooting. Just melee benefits the reroll | |
|
| |
Bibitybopitybacon Wych
Posts : 592 Join date : 2012-07-01
| Subject: Re: The end of the SC on infantry. Sun Oct 12 2014, 06:58 | |
| - 1++ wrote:
- The strength does effect the to wound result, but on reading over the rule, I think I'm wrong with the reroll to wound from shooting. Just melee benefits the reroll
Yep it does with melee but not shooting. | |
|
| |
1++ Hekatrix
Posts : 1036 Join date : 2011-06-27 Location : Sydney
| Subject: Re: The end of the SC on infantry. Sun Oct 12 2014, 07:10 | |
| "Similarly, if a model makes a shooting attack with a weapon that has the Poisoned special rule, it always wounds on a fixed number (generally shown in brackets), unless a lower result would be required." | |
|
| |
Bibitybopitybacon Wych
Posts : 592 Join date : 2012-07-01
| Subject: Re: The end of the SC on infantry. Sun Oct 12 2014, 07:16 | |
| - 1++ wrote:
- "Similarly, if a model makes a shooting attack with a weapon that has the Poisoned special rule, it always wounds on a fixed number (generally shown in brackets), unless a lower result would be required."
that goes by the weapon's strength, not the model. The splinter cannon has a strength of one. | |
|
| |
Silverglade Wych
Posts : 521 Join date : 2012-12-30
| Subject: Re: The end of the SC on infantry. Sun Oct 12 2014, 07:39 | |
| | |
|
| |
1++ Hekatrix
Posts : 1036 Join date : 2011-06-27 Location : Sydney
| Subject: Re: The end of the SC on infantry. Sun Oct 12 2014, 08:09 | |
| - Bibitybopitybacon wrote:
- 1++ wrote:
- "Similarly, if a model makes a shooting attack with a weapon that has the Poisoned special rule, it always wounds on a fixed number (generally shown in brackets), unless a lower result would be required."
that goes by the weapon's strength, not the model. The splinter cannon has a strength of one. oic, thanks for clarifying it that way. Now it makes sense lol | |
|
| |
Grokfog Slave
Posts : 20 Join date : 2012-04-02 Location : sheffield
| Subject: Re: The end of the SC on infantry. Sun Oct 12 2014, 11:36 | |
| On topic, I think I'd have to refute the belief that splinter cannons are useless on infantry. Yes, the salvo rule has taken a little bite out of it, but the change to splinter racks, IMHO, more than makes up for it. | |
|
| |
Klaivex Charondyr Wych
Posts : 918 Join date : 2014-09-08
| Subject: Re: The end of the SC on infantry. Sun Oct 12 2014, 11:41 | |
| Dont forget both items also went up 5 points. Im really indecisive on this. | |
|
| |
Selvhan Hellion
Posts : 81 Join date : 2013-03-09
| Subject: Re: The end of the SC on infantry. Sun Oct 12 2014, 17:13 | |
| For me the SC at 15 pts is a clear indication that blaster are now the way to go with trueborn on an all around list. Anyway, your venoms will have 2 SC and you will probably have a couple of them. Since the transport does not have to target the same unit as their passenger, I see no point in having overpriced SC on trueborn. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: The end of the SC on infantry. | |
| |
|
| |
| The end of the SC on infantry. | |
|