| -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist | |
|
+5shadowseercB AzraeI Siticus the Ancient Silverglade Dizzie 9 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
Dizzie Kabalite Warrior
Posts : 104 Join date : 2012-11-10
| Subject: -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist Tue May 08 2018, 04:19 | |
|
Maybe i'm wrong but the blood glaive artefact does not have the special rule under it like other artefacts. am i correct in assuming then, that there is no -1 to hit on it due to replacing the archite glaive?
seems pretty clean cut to me, just making sure i'm not missing something, never noticed this before myself.
| |
|
| |
Silverglade Wych
Posts : 521 Join date : 2012-12-30
| Subject: Re: -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist Tue May 08 2018, 04:54 | |
| no. you are correct.
Many armies have a relic like this that removes the -1 to hit for things like thunder hammers and power fists.
| |
|
| |
Siticus the Ancient Wych
Posts : 936 Join date : 2011-09-10 Location : Riga, Latvia
| Subject: Re: -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist Tue May 08 2018, 06:17 | |
| The Blood Glaive does not have the hit penalty indeed. | |
|
| |
AzraeI Wych
Posts : 630 Join date : 2018-03-04 Location : maybe
| Subject: Re: -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist Tue May 08 2018, 12:19 | |
| the regular glaive should also not have the penalty plus it should be interchangeable i want my agoniser blast pistol SUCCubus back | |
|
| |
shadowseercB Wych
Posts : 550 Join date : 2012-10-21
| Subject: Re: -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist Sun May 13 2018, 19:22 | |
| - AzraeI wrote:
- the regular glaive should also not have the penalty plus it should be interchangeable
i want my agoniser blast pistol SUCCubus back Turn 3 it wont make much of a difference since you will be hitting on 2's anyway unless your opponent has a -1 to hit him. | |
|
| |
AzraeI Wych
Posts : 630 Join date : 2018-03-04 Location : maybe
| Subject: Re: -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist Sun May 13 2018, 19:27 | |
| - shadowseercB wrote:
- AzraeI wrote:
- the regular glaive should also not have the penalty plus it should be interchangeable
i want my agoniser blast pistol SUCCubus back Turn 3 it wont make much of a difference since you will be hitting on 2's anyway unless your opponent has a -1 to hit him. it does if you plan on using the tesla warlord trait | |
|
| |
hexxenwyrd Hellion
Posts : 92 Join date : 2018-04-24
| Subject: Re: -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist Sun May 13 2018, 22:41 | |
| That trait is strife only, can't be combined with blood glaive. But red grief should be able to get the succubus into melee turn 2. So they will get a benefit from that, on top of the already good +1 str, and great +1average damage. | |
|
| |
AzraeI Wych
Posts : 630 Join date : 2018-03-04 Location : maybe
| Subject: Re: -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist Mon May 14 2018, 12:51 | |
| yes i was talking about a regular glaive and cult of strife succubus, and how the -1 should not be on any glaive | |
|
| |
amorrowlyday Hekatrix
Posts : 1318 Join date : 2015-03-15 Location : Massachusetts
| Subject: Re: -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist Mon May 14 2018, 19:46 | |
| If your going cult of strife anyway why not just take their artifact, and make them your +1 ws druggie? | |
|
| |
AzraeI Wych
Posts : 630 Join date : 2018-03-04 Location : maybe
| Subject: Re: -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist Mon May 14 2018, 20:08 | |
| because this still doesnt affect the warlord trait, just the dice roll that is required to hit | |
|
| |
dumpeal Hekatrix
Posts : 1275 Join date : 2015-02-13 Location : Québec
| Subject: Re: -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist Mon May 14 2018, 20:30 | |
| - amorrowlyday wrote:
- If your going cult of strife anyway why not just take their artifact, and make them your +1 ws druggie?
+1 WS doesn't counter -1 to hit. There's lot and lots of threads on this specific topic. | |
|
| |
amorrowlyday Hekatrix
Posts : 1318 Join date : 2015-03-15 Location : Massachusetts
| Subject: Re: -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist Mon May 14 2018, 20:35 | |
| I know. And the conclusion they draw is you are wrong. You still fail natural ones, but it is absolutely possible to have a weapon skill of 1+, for a roll of a 2 to be reduced to a 1 but for your weapon skill to still apply because it was not an unmodified 1.
And if you want to have that conversation we can have it elsewhere. | |
|
| |
hexxenwyrd Hellion
Posts : 92 Join date : 2018-04-24
| Subject: Re: -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist Mon May 14 2018, 21:23 | |
| >want agonizer blast pistol succubus back?
For modeling purposes? Because I doubt anyone will call you on one modeled like that which counts as glave+pistol. Rules wise, I'm pretty sure you don't. Unless you are facing t6, non-vehicle units, the glaive is better starting turn 3, and even turn 2 the glaive is better against the cast majority of targets. And still then it costs 4 points left.
If you really want to pay 4 points to be better against <5% of targets, which you will still be bad against, and worse the majority of the time. Well I guess you be you. | |
|
| |
dumpeal Hekatrix
Posts : 1275 Join date : 2015-02-13 Location : Québec
| Subject: Re: -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist Mon May 14 2018, 22:39 | |
| - amorrowlyday wrote:
- I know. And the conclusion they draw is you are wrong. You still fail natural ones, but it is absolutely possible to have a weapon skill of 1+, for a roll of a 2 to be reduced to a 1 but for your weapon skill to still apply because it was not an unmodified 1.
And if you want to have that conversation we can have it elsewhere. I won't re-start this debate again but while I agree with the 1+ roll, a 6+ on the modified roll is impossible (rolling from 0 to 5) and the warlord trait never trigger. It was the biggest fail of the chapter approved release. | |
|
| |
Barrywise Wych
Posts : 621 Join date : 2012-11-14 Location : Illinois
| Subject: Re: -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist Fri May 18 2018, 17:00 | |
| - dumpeal wrote:
a 6+ on the modified roll is impossible (rolling from 0 to 5) Sorry, small quip, and I think it's important we make the difference very clear for new players/members to the forum in the future, You roll a 1 to 6. Your 1->6 roll is then modified to a "0 to 5." The interaction of combat drugs, Weapon Skill and 6+ abilities is pretty funky. WS 2+ -> 1+ with a -1 modifier, still hits 5/6 of the time, but doesn't trigger the 6+ WS 2+ -> 2+ with no modifier, hits 5/6 of the time, triggers on a 6+ WS 2+ -> 2+ with a +1 mod, hits 5/6 of the time, triggers on a 5+ | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist | |
| |
|
| |
| -1 to hit on blood glaive doesn't exist | |
|