THE DARK CITY
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.



 
HomeDark Eldar WikiDark Eldar ResourcesLatest imagesNull CityRegisterLog in

 

 40k 9th Editon

Go down 
+56
Swordxart
PartridgeKing
Hanga
AzraeI
colinsherlow
Crazy_Ivan
Gelmir
Squidmaster
Vailex
Burnage
HERO
Subsanity
Malkyr
sekac
Crucible of Sorrow
False Son
fisheyes
Soulless Samurai
Rodi Sikni
Silverglade
krayd
amishprn86
mynamelegend
Ubernoob1
Lyijysiipi
Jimsolo
Scrz
Myrvn
TheBaconPope
Genomir
DevilDoll
SCP Yeeman
ferrusmanus
SERAFF
Count Adhemar
Drager
Aschen
megatrons2nd
Dalamar
Archon_91
sweetbacon
albions-angel
AlCorps
Glass Battleaxe
Skulnbonz
yellabelly
The Strange Dark One
Sarcron
velaresh
Void Prince
Braden Campbell
dumpeal
hydranixx
Azdrubael
LordSplata
Cavash
60 posters
Go to page : Previous  1 ... 13 ... 22, 23, 24 ... 27 ... 32  Next
AuthorMessage
DevilDoll
Wych
DevilDoll


Posts : 523
Join date : 2013-08-16

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeMon Jul 13 2020, 21:26

Sarcron wrote:
Oh wtf.

We lost fire and fade. And if I'm just tripping and we do have units with asuryani (Which I'm fairly sure we don't), we lost it for aircraft, so no invincible planes...

*Page 119 – Stratagems, Fire and Fade
Change the first sentence to read:
‘You can use this Stratagem after an Asuryani unit from your
army (excluding Aircraft) shoots in the Shooting phase.’

man i was hoping we would at least keep that, it was pretty fluffy for a plane to fly over shoot and disapear but NOOOOOOOOO we can have untargetable invincible dreads raining down 4 lascannon shots per round but a plane that cannot be targeted using a fluffy stratagem is too OP...

Anyway not that it wont get changed as well but as it stands aircraft are still unchargable right?
Back to top Go down
krayd
Hekatrix
krayd


Posts : 1343
Join date : 2011-10-03
Location : Richmond, VA

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeMon Jul 13 2020, 21:31

[quote="DevilDoll"]
Sarcron wrote:
Oh wtf.

Anyway not that it wont get changed as well but as it stands aircraft are still unchargable right?

I don't think that anyone *actually* believes that we lost Fire and Fade. Razz

Technically, aircraft are still unchargeable. The datasheet says that they can only be attacked in close combat by units with FLY. However, the core rules state that no unit (FLY or otherwise) can end any kind of move, except for a pile-in or heroic intervention, within engagement range of AIRCRAFT, so RAW, planes are unchargeable.
Back to top Go down
Crucible of Sorrow
Slave
Crucible of Sorrow


Posts : 10
Join date : 2018-04-17

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeMon Jul 13 2020, 21:32

Sarcron wrote:
Oh wtf.

We lost fire and fade. And if I'm just tripping and we do have units with asuryani (Which I'm fairly sure we don't), we lost it for aircraft, so no invincible planes...

*Page 119 – Stratagems, Fire and Fade
Change the first sentence to read:
‘You can use this Stratagem after an Asuryani unit from your
army (excluding Aircraft) shoots in the Shooting phase.’
That is a typo, I'm pretty sure. Copy and pasted from the other FAQs.

Drukhari do still have the advantage of Raiding Party. People dismiss it, but it is a massive bonus to be able to bring 3 different traits for 0 CP cost. Of course, how effective each component will be remains to be seen.

I am not sure we want to run 10-man squads because blasts will just wreck them. This kind of makes Wyches really bad, since they were only really decent in 10-man squads before IMO. Even flocks went up! I may have to shelve my Drukhari for a while and just play Harlequins and Guard until the True Kin get their new codex.

Here is my dogshit taco attempt at a list, I think it may be a handful of points over even... *sigh*


Black Heart Patrol
Archon (Warlord, Writ, Splinter Pistol, Huskblade)
5 Warriors with Shredder
Venom
2x Ravagers with Disintegrators

Black Heart Patrol
Archon (Huskblade Splinter Pistol, PGL)
5 Warriors with Shredder
Venom
Raider with Dark Lance (for second archon and Wyches)
2x Reapers

Custom Cult (Slashing Impact, Test of Skill)
Succubus with hydra gauntlets, +Strength, PGL (can she take this, can't remember)
5x Wyches with Shardnet and Impaler, +Movement
6x Reavers with 2 blasters, grav talons, +Toughness
6x Reavers with 2 blasters, grav talons, +Attack
2x Razorwings with Disintegrators


I gotta laugh though, I got banned from the Facebook Drukhari group for saying Cronos are crap... and they are even more crap now. Hilarious.
Back to top Go down
sekac
Wych
sekac


Posts : 744
Join date : 2017-06-03

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeMon Jul 13 2020, 21:39

Swordxart wrote:
sekac wrote:
I am shocked by the nearly 40% increase for voidravens. They lost more than they gained and are significantly more expensive.

Voidravens went up 20 Points and thats it?

You pay 20 points per dark scythe now too.
Back to top Go down
Crucible of Sorrow
Slave
Crucible of Sorrow


Posts : 10
Join date : 2018-04-17

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeMon Jul 13 2020, 21:41

Void lance is 0 though, and IMO was always the better weapon since it's S9.
Back to top Go down
False Son
Sybarite
False Son


Posts : 307
Join date : 2012-12-23

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeMon Jul 13 2020, 21:52

Yeah, but Void Lances only kill 1 Primaris each. Dark Scythes would be 6 shots against a unit of 6 or more.
Back to top Go down
sekac
Wych
sekac


Posts : 744
Join date : 2017-06-03

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeMon Jul 13 2020, 22:08

Crucible of Sorrow wrote:
Void lance is 0 though, and IMO was always the better weapon since it's S9.

Not with Test of Skill. Dark Scythes wounds T7 and lower on 2s anyway. Void lances were only (slightly) better at T8 and T9. Dark Scythes at T10+ again.

Back to top Go down
Crucible of Sorrow
Slave
Crucible of Sorrow


Posts : 10
Join date : 2018-04-17

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeMon Jul 13 2020, 22:09

False Son wrote:
Yeah, but Void Lances only kill 1 Primaris each.  Dark Scythes would be 6 shots against a unit of 6 or more.
Eh, i don't expect too many 6+ man units among elite armies, they have very little to gain from that.

Also many of them are rocking 3 wounds now (eradicators, blade guard, etc.)
sekac wrote:


Crucible of Sorrow wrote:
Void lance is 0 though, and IMO was always the better weapon since it's S9.

Not with Test of Skill. Dark Scythes wounds T7 and lower on 2s anyway. Void lances were only (slightly) better at T8 and T9. Dark Scythes at T10+ again.

Fair point, but there is no way I am paying over 200 points for a Void Bomber. I probably just won't use it at all (since patrols only allow 2 fliers anyway...)
Back to top Go down
False Son
Sybarite
False Son


Posts : 307
Join date : 2012-12-23

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeMon Jul 13 2020, 22:20

Crucible of Sorrow wrote:

Eh, i don't expect too many 6+ man units among elite armies, they have very little to gain from that.

I expect there to be some 6+ sized units in order to take advantage of the offensive Stratagems, especially if they can deploy from reserve.


tbh, i'm still considering two 20 man Kabalites coming via Webway Portal. That, or a beast bomb of 10 Clawed Fiends.
Back to top Go down
Soulless Samurai
Incubi
Soulless Samurai


Posts : 1921
Join date : 2018-04-02

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeMon Jul 13 2020, 22:27

krayd wrote:
Lhamean's shaimashi blade got hit with a huge nerf, due to the new wording. No more mortal wounds on 4s.

Thank goodness GW have finally put an end to all those Poison Tongue Lhamaean lists that have been dominating the meta for years now. Rolling Eyes
Back to top Go down
HERO
Hekatrix
HERO


Posts : 1057
Join date : 2012-04-13

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeMon Jul 13 2020, 22:38

sekac wrote:
Swordxart wrote:
sekac wrote:
I am shocked by the nearly 40% increase for voidravens. They lost more than they gained and are significantly more expensive.

Voidravens went up 20 Points and thats it?

You pay 20 points per dark scythe now too.

Nah, it looks like it's 185 for the full package; both Void Lances and Scythes are 0, as are all missiles:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-orE6HSrv3zYnI5UfXgctcSuezpLf7fK8F_8nR1M2KA/htmlview#
Back to top Go down
sekac
Wych
sekac


Posts : 744
Join date : 2017-06-03

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeMon Jul 13 2020, 23:10

HERO wrote:
sekac wrote:
Swordxart wrote:
sekac wrote:
I am shocked by the nearly 40% increase for voidravens. They lost more than they gained and are significantly more expensive.

Voidravens went up 20 Points and thats it?

You pay 20 points per dark scythe now too.

Nah, it looks like it's 185 for the full package; both Void Lances and Scythes are 0, as are all missiles:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-orE6HSrv3zYnI5UfXgctcSuezpLf7fK8F_8nR1M2KA/htmlview#

So now the question is which leak is right? I hope the one you presented.
Back to top Go down
Crucible of Sorrow
Slave
Crucible of Sorrow


Posts : 10
Join date : 2018-04-17

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeMon Jul 13 2020, 23:34

Why are splinter cannons 50% more expensive than shuriken cannons. Sad
Back to top Go down
Soulless Samurai
Incubi
Soulless Samurai


Posts : 1921
Join date : 2018-04-02

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeMon Jul 13 2020, 23:45

Crucible of Sorrow wrote:
Why are splinter cannons 50% more expensive than shuriken cannons. Sad

Presumably because they can potentially get twice as many shots.

The fact that those shots are drastically worse than those of the Shuriken Cannon is presumably considered an irrelevant detail by GW.
Back to top Go down
The Strange Dark One
Wych
The Strange Dark One


Posts : 881
Join date : 2014-08-22
Location : Private subrealm of the Eldritch Skies Kabal.

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeTue Jul 14 2020, 00:39

Venoms are losing hard this edition. And there are many more than questionable point hikes across our book (Haywire Scourges went up 25% WTF).

Many options took a 15-20 percent increase (including transports etc.). I think the Voidraven will be useful while Razorwings are dead in the water. 195pts for 2 Disintegrator Cannons on a flier? Over my dead body.

I liked Red Grief + Flayed Skull in 8th, but 9th seems to force us further into the archetypical Black Hand + Prophest of Flesh list. Taloi are still affordable and six of them in a PoF Patrol are more than enough. And Wracks are the only troops that won't get blasted from the board instantly.

Btw: Wracks and Kabalites in a Dark Lance Raider cost 20% more and Wyches even 25% more. I'm glad they finally nerfed our Wyches, they clearly dominated the meta and never got shot to pieces.

Why anybody would competitively take Wych Cults now is beyond me. Hellions and Wyches are stupidly overpriced and it's not worth for Reavers alone. I'd rather take more Coven stuff.

Disintegrator Ravagers cost 15% more and lost what made it great in last edition. But it seems they will be needed more than ever.

I'm surprised this edition should be about Necrons, everything seems geared towards the Primaris show. I haven't looked at them in detail, but there is no way that our beloved Spess Mahreens are anywhere near the 20% price hike. It's another case of GW just having no clue what they were doing, or caring. Probably both.

Those are my takeaways after doing lots of number crunching. I already had a bad feeling with our faction preview (you know, from the "Aeldari Exprt" guy who was only known for playing Craftworlds). Whoever this guy is, he lost all credibility for calling Reavers "key units".

Note: I'm doing game design and RTS balance as a hobby and I've worked with several mod/community projects over many years. I see those changes as a semi-professional insult. A random number generator would have done a better job.
Back to top Go down
False Son
Sybarite
False Son


Posts : 307
Join date : 2012-12-23

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeTue Jul 14 2020, 01:53

The Strange Dark One wrote:
I'm glad they finally nerfed our Wyches, they clearly dominated the meta and never got shot to pieces.

Why anybody would competitively take Wych Cults now is beyond me. Hellions and Wyches are stupidly overpriced and it's not worth for Reavers alone. I'd rather take more Coven stuff.

My hope is that with this edition's emphasis on positioning and lack of automatic Overwatch Wych Cults will come out ok. Red Grief seems like an automatic choice at this point.
Back to top Go down
Crucible of Sorrow
Slave
Crucible of Sorrow


Posts : 10
Join date : 2018-04-17

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeTue Jul 14 2020, 02:18

The Strange Dark One wrote:
Venoms are losing hard this edition. And there are many more than questionable point hikes across our book (Haywire Scourges went up 25% WTF).

Many options took a 15-20 percent increase (including transports etc.). I think the Voidraven will be useful while Razorwings are dead in the water. 195pts for 2 Disintegrator Cannons on a flier? Over my dead body.
175 for Razorwings with two cannons, but I get your point.

There will be another re-balance a couple of weeks after the Space Marine codex comes out and they wreck everyone's face for the first month or two of this edition (and then continue wrecking face just not as much).

Arfmasterson likes this post

Back to top Go down
False Son
Sybarite
False Son


Posts : 307
Join date : 2012-12-23

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeTue Jul 14 2020, 02:24

Part of me thinks GW is still embarrassed from the 6th and 7th edition debacles when xenos ran rampant.
Back to top Go down
sekac
Wych
sekac


Posts : 744
Join date : 2017-06-03

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeTue Jul 14 2020, 02:26

The Strange Dark One wrote:
Venoms are losing hard this edition. And there are many more than questionable point hikes across our book (Haywire Scourges went up 25% WTF).

Many options took a 15-20 percent increase (including transports etc.). I think the Voidraven will be useful while Razorwings are dead in the water. 195pts for 2 Disintegrator Cannons on a flier? Over my dead body.

I liked Red Grief + Flayed Skull in 8th, but 9th seems to force us further into the archetypical Black Hand + Prophest of Flesh list. Taloi are still affordable and six of them in a PoF Patrol are more than enough. And Wracks are the only troops that won't get blasted from the board instantly.

Btw: Wracks and Kabalites in a Dark Lance Raider cost 20% more and Wyches even 25% more. I'm glad they finally nerfed our Wyches, they clearly dominated the meta and never got shot to pieces.

Why anybody would competitively take Wych Cults now is beyond me. Hellions and Wyches are stupidly overpriced and it's not worth for Reavers alone. I'd rather take more Coven stuff.

Disintegrator Ravagers cost 15% more and lost what made it great in last edition. But it seems they will be needed more than ever.

I'm surprised this edition should be about Necrons, everything seems geared towards the Primaris show. I haven't looked at them in detail, but there is no way that our beloved Spess Mahreens are anywhere near the 20% price hike. It's another case of GW just having no clue what they were doing, or caring. Probably both.

Those are my takeaways after doing lots of number crunching. I already had a bad feeling with our faction preview (you know, from the "Aeldari Exprt" guy who was only known for playing Craftworlds). Whoever this guy is, he lost all credibility for calling Reavers "key units".

Note: I'm doing game design and RTS balance as a hobby and I've worked with several mod/community projects over many years. I see those changes as a semi-professional insult. A random number generator would have done a better job.

Point of order: Razorwing looks to be 170. 120+25+25. Obviously, it is safe to use your splinter cannon piece as a toothpick at this point though.

Otherwise, I agree with you overall.

I am excited about the potential of DT Talos and Chronos right now. The Chronos is the same cost as far as I can tell. Maybe 10 points more, but being able to fire that spirit syphon in close combat is really good. Auto-hitting with str 3, +1 to wound, AP-2, D2 and D3+1 damage on 5s is really deadly. Talos twin-liquifiers (which got much cheaper) are great for the same reason.

If people charge our monsters and don't kill them, they'll get blown off the table--likely in our own shooting phase. If there's anything in charge range afterwards, go for it.

They're gonna mix it up in the mid-board.
Back to top Go down
HERO
Hekatrix
HERO


Posts : 1057
Join date : 2012-04-13

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeTue Jul 14 2020, 02:53

sekac wrote:
HERO wrote:
sekac wrote:
Swordxart wrote:
sekac wrote:
I am shocked by the nearly 40% increase for voidravens. They lost more than they gained and are significantly more expensive.

Voidravens went up 20 Points and thats it?

You pay 20 points per dark scythe now too.

Nah, it looks like it's 185 for the full package; both Void Lances and Scythes are 0, as are all missiles:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-orE6HSrv3zYnI5UfXgctcSuezpLf7fK8F_8nR1M2KA/htmlview#

So now the question is which leak is right? I hope the one you presented.

That one is sourced from this,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQY932e6hN4

Which is SS82 (eldar player) reading off from his advanced copy lol.
Back to top Go down
HERO
Hekatrix
HERO


Posts : 1057
Join date : 2012-04-13

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeTue Jul 14 2020, 02:54

The Strange Dark One wrote:
Note: I'm doing game design and RTS balance as a hobby and I've worked with several mod/community projects over many years. I see those changes as a semi-professional insult. A random number generator would have done a better job.

How you feel about that Venom Blade costing the same as Huskblade? Very Happy
Back to top Go down
Doctor1999
Slave
Doctor1999


Posts : 16
Join date : 2020-07-14

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeTue Jul 14 2020, 03:08

I’m thinking that Incubi come out ahead from these point changes.

Incubi put out a high amount of attacks at good AP and can potentially inflict multi-wound damage. Seeing as most of the Cult units became pretty unusable, they’re likely one of the strongest melee infantry unit we have. The only other things that I think serve a similar role better would be the Talos with Macro Scalpels, but with a Raider transport they’re more mobile. I don’t really see Disintegrator Spam as a viable option at the moment because paying +20 points on Ravagers, +15 Points on Raiders and around +15 points on the Warrior units inside the Raiders in an edition which seems to place a heavy emphasis on holding/storming objectives...

Now, they’re still not good compared Assault Intercessors which are substantially tougher, put out more attacks, and get their faction benefit. But compared to our own units, they’re pretty good. Before you could get two Warriors for every Incubi and have a couple points left over. I’m going to try and forget what our points used to be (Crying or Very sad) and hopefully something good comes out of this edition!

I’m going to try and add in 15 Incubi between two Raiders with Dark Lances backed by Drazhar as my fragile glass hammer. (As soon as the global pandemic allows Crying or Very sad). Hopefully they do well backed by some Talos, Ravagers and Venoms!

PS. Not new to the Dark Kin, but new to the site! Hope you’re all well given the circumstances!

Gelmir likes this post

Back to top Go down
Malkyr
Slave
Malkyr


Posts : 2
Join date : 2020-07-13

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeTue Jul 14 2020, 04:07

I am an outsider looking in to the faction but I think the troop points going up makes sense thematically, which seems to be how GW envisions and balances their game. Eldar of any flavor probably shouldn't be run in huge numbers and Dark Eldar's niche always seemed to be as super fast and effective killing machines.

In an edition where people have to hold Objectives til their turn starts having the hitting power to kill all the other guys stuff every turn and the mobility to zip around the board to take last second points seems like it might work in the the armies favor. I'm hoping in the next codex GW doubles down on the killing power of Drukhari to balance out the more elite model count if they can make that work.

I know I have been eyeballing these gorgeous models for years now and the downright reasonable (by GW standards) dollar to point ratio means I finally plan to jump in and try the army out for 9th ed.
Back to top Go down
DevilDoll
Wych
DevilDoll


Posts : 523
Join date : 2013-08-16

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeTue Jul 14 2020, 05:24

Did mandrakes get a point increase at all? They were pretty cheap before and borderline playable, maybe they are even better now?
Back to top Go down
sekac
Wych
sekac


Posts : 744
Join date : 2017-06-03

40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitimeTue Jul 14 2020, 06:09

DevilDoll wrote:
Did mandrakes get a point increase at all? They were pretty cheap before and borderline playable, maybe they are even better now?

Yeah looks like they're going up by 3 points. So 85 for a minimum squad. They're still decent, I think.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content





40k 9th Editon - Page 23 Empty
PostSubject: Re: 40k 9th Editon   40k 9th Editon - Page 23 I_icon_minitime

Back to top Go down
 
40k 9th Editon
Back to top 
Page 23 of 32Go to page : Previous  1 ... 13 ... 22, 23, 24 ... 27 ... 32  Next

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
THE DARK CITY :: 

GENERAL DRUKHARI DISCUSSION

 :: News & Rumours
-
Jump to: